{"id":7553,"date":"2021-11-29T22:51:01","date_gmt":"2021-11-29T22:51:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.no-lockdown.com\/?p=7553"},"modified":"2021-11-29T22:54:09","modified_gmt":"2021-11-29T22:54:09","slug":"leaders-lied-vaccinated-people-threat-to-vulnerable-groups","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.no-lockdown.com\/index.php\/2021\/11\/29\/leaders-lied-vaccinated-people-threat-to-vulnerable-groups\/","title":{"rendered":"Leaders Lied \u2013 Vaccinated People Threat To Vulnerable Groups"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Video Transcript<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

So now we want to vaccinate the entire world. Naturally one wonders why, because up until now the reasons have all been either wrong or misleading. Allow me to summarize:\n\n\n\nAt first, they said they only wanted to vaccinate the vulnerable groups. So, the people over 60.\n\n\n\nNow they say, no, you have to start at the age of 18.\n\n\n\nThen the second reason was, we need 70% [vaccinated] for herd immunity.\n\n\n\nNow they say we need 100%. The peak of this absurdity is that the unvaccinated are a danger to the vaccinated. We haven\u2019t heard that one before.\n\n\n\nThe third justification is that we had to be vaccinated out of solidarity.\n\n\n\nOut of solidarity with vulnerable groups.\n\n\n\nNow, it is said that the vaccinated have a particularly high viral load, which means that for vulnerable groups, it is obviously safest if they are visited by unvaccinated people.\n\n\n\nAnd now, we have more and more vaccine breakthroughs, i.e. people who become severely ill with COVID, despite being vaccinated twice. The newest rationale to be heard here now is, since the first two vaccinations have thus totally failed, we should urgently be vaccinated a third time, with a vaccine that will probably fail just like the last two vaccines did the first time around. That\u2019s really smart.\n\n\n\nIn Germany, we have 48 confirmed cases of deaths that occurred in connection with the vaccination. 48 cases, those are just the cases that were autopsied. Of course, we know that many people who died after a vaccination were not autopsied at all.\n\n\n\nThat means the unreported number is probably many times higher.\n\n\n\nIf any company, let\u2019s say Nestl\u00e9 or Pepsi or any other company were to put a product on the market and then 48 people were to die from it within a year, we wouldn\u2019t talk about whether we should or should not distribute this product to the world.\n\n\n\nWe would talk about whether or not we should enforce liability on the management.\n\n\n\nThat\u2019s what I would urgently suggest that this parliament do. We should be discussing the [lack of] efficacy of these vaccines and about liability issues for the management of the vaccine manufacturers.\n\n\n\nI think that\u2019s what this parliament should concentrate on, not on vaccinating the world. Thank you very much.\n\n                                             \n                                        Translation: Miss Piggy<\/em> \n\nhttps:\/\/rairfoundation.com\/mep-demand-answers-when-will-vaccine-deaths-be-counted-video\/<\/pre>\n\n\n\n
\n